top of page
Focus Frame logo in teal on dark background

Whose Team Are You On?

Writer: Andrew Goldberg
Andrew Goldberg
Aug 22
5 min read

We tend to think conflict means something has gone wrong.

If a relationship is healthy, shouldn’t we get along? Shouldn’t things feel peaceful? Shouldn’t we be able to avoid hurting or upsetting each other?

I’m not sure that’s the right goal.

Disagreement and conflict aren’t necessarily the problem.

It’s how we have them.

Priya Parker, a conflict facilitator and author of The Art of Gathering, talks about the difference between avoiding conflict, destructive conflict, and what she calls “healthy heat.”

On one side, there’s unhealthy peace. We don’t say what needs to be said because we don’t want to create tension.

On the other, there’s destructive conflict. We blame, attack, insult, or try to win.

Healthy heat is somewhere in the middle.

It means being willing to stay in the discomfort long enough to actually deal with what’s happening without turning the other person into the enemy.

That distinction has stuck with me.

Sometimes peace is just silence

Let’s say someone I care about does something that hurts me.

I can say nothing.

Maybe I convince myself it isn’t a big deal. Maybe I don’t want to make things awkward. Maybe I’m worried they’ll get defensive.

So I leave it alone.

Except I’m still hurt.

Maybe I start pulling away. Maybe I get irritated about smaller things. Maybe I complain about them to someone else. Maybe I start constructing a whole story about what their behavior means.

Nothing has been said between us, but something has changed between us.

That isn’t necessarily peace.

Sometimes it’s just silence.

And silence can create distance too.

The alternative isn’t attacking

Of course, speaking up doesn’t automatically make conflict healthy.

I can take my hurt and turn it into:

You don’t care about me.

You’re selfish.

You always do this.

Now I’m no longer telling you what I’m experiencing.

I’m telling you who you are.

An old therapist of mine gave me a rule I’ve carried with me for years:

Put your thoughts and feelings into words without attacking.

That sounds simple.

It isn’t.

Instead of telling you, “You clearly don’t care about me,” I might have to say:

“When that happened, I felt hurt.”

“I’ve been sitting on this because I didn’t want to create tension between us.”

“I care about our relationship, and I don’t want this to quietly turn into resentment.”

That’s harder.

Because now I’m exposed.

That’s where vulnerability comes in

Brené Brown is a researcher and author whose work has focused extensively on vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy.

One of the central ideas in her work is that vulnerability involves uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure.

That’s exactly what healthy conflict asks of us.

If I tell you how I actually feel, I don’t control what happens next.

You might understand.

You might disagree.

You might get defensive.

You might tell me something about myself that I don’t particularly want to hear.

That’s the risk.

Avoidance gives me some protection from that risk.

Attacking can too. Anger often feels safer than saying, “That hurt me.”

Vulnerability asks me to give up some of that protection.

We do it because we care

This may be the most important part.

Why have the uncomfortable conversation at all?

Why make you uncomfortable?

Why make myself uncomfortable?

Why risk misunderstanding or rejection?

Because I give a shit.

If I don’t care about the relationship, I don’t necessarily need to do any of this.

I can smile, say everything is fine, go home, and slowly stop calling.

But when someone matters to me, an uncomfortable conversation may be worth having.

That changes the meaning of conflict.

Sometimes saying the difficult thing isn’t evidence that a relationship is failing.

Sometimes it’s evidence that we care enough to try.

I’m essentially saying:

You matter enough to me that I’m willing to risk some discomfort rather than quietly let something grow between us.

Honesty still needs care

There’s an important qualification here.

“I’m just being honest” isn’t permission to say whatever we want however we want.

Honesty can become a weapon.

Buddhist teachings around Right Speech make a useful distinction: it isn’t enough for something simply to be true. We should also consider whether saying it is useful and whether the way and timing are appropriate.

That gives me a few questions to ask myself:

Is this true?

Why am I saying it?

Am I trying to help us understand each other, repair something, or protect an important boundary?

Or am I trying to hurt you because I feel hurt?

Healthy conflict still requires honesty.

But it asks us to tell the truth without using it as a weapon.

Harmony doesn’t mean everyone plays the same note

I keep coming back to music.

We use the word harmony to describe relationships where everybody gets along.

But harmony doesn’t mean everyone plays the same note.

There are different notes.

There is tension.

There is dissonance.

And there is resolution.

Without difference, there isn’t much harmony to begin with.

Relationships are going to have dissonance too.

We are different people with different histories, needs, expectations, fears, and ways of seeing the world.

Of course we’re going to misunderstand each other.

Of course we’re going to disagree.

Of course we’re occasionally going to hurt one another.

The presence of conflict doesn’t necessarily tell us whether a relationship is healthy.

What we do with the conflict might.

Can I tell you I’m hurt without trying to hurt you back?

Can you tell me something difficult without humiliating me?

Can I listen without immediately preparing my defense?

Can we disagree without turning each other into enemies?

Can we tolerate some discomfort long enough to actually understand what’s happening?

That sounds a lot more like harmony to me than pretending there was never any dissonance in the first place.

Whose team are you on?

Maybe one of the most useful things we can remember in the middle of a difficult conversation is incredibly simple:

We’re on the same team.

That doesn’t mean we agree.

It doesn’t mean either of us gets a free pass.

It doesn’t mean there aren’t boundaries or consequences.

It means I’m trying to remember why we’re having the conversation.

I’m not trying to defeat you.

I’m trying to understand, protect, repair, or improve something between us.

The problem is something we can look at together rather than treating each other as the problem.

That changes the purpose of conflict.

The goal stops being:

How do I win?

And becomes:

How do we work through this?

Healthy conflict isn’t about eliminating disagreement.

It isn’t about avoiding discomfort.

And it isn’t about saying whatever we want in the name of authenticity.

It’s about learning to tell the truth with care.

To risk vulnerability.

To tolerate some discomfort.

To put our thoughts and feelings into words without attacking.

Sometimes the willingness to have that uncomfortable conversation is one of the clearest ways we can tell another person:

I care about you. I care about this. I care about us.

Because underneath the disagreement, there’s something worth remembering.

We’re on the same team.

Learn more

Priya Parker is a conflict facilitator, strategic advisor, and author of The Art of Gathering. Her work explores how people gather, navigate difference, and engage in more productive conflict.

Brené Brown, PhD, LMSW, is a researcher and author whose work focuses on courage, vulnerability, shame, and empathy.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page